Cabin fever, occasioned
by restricted kayaking due to stormy weather at sea and sewerage
contamination of sheltered waters, led me to walking the Downs this
spring.
At the start of the
1970s I was an agricultural student at UCNW Bangor. One of the
questions in the final exams was: Compare The Grass Crop, Davies
(1952) and some other scientific tome hot off the press. A
question to scupper most students. No-one would have noticed the
dusty and faded Grass Crop on the library shelves; however,
they should have glanced at the other, title and author long
forgotten; it was a set book. By lucky chance, a tumble resulting in
a month or so in plaster had led to me taking time off mountaineering
in my final year. I could manage to cycle with my lower leg cast from
Beaumaris to Bangor, crutches strapped to the cross-bar and hobble
into the library. It was even greater luck that a moment of boredom
had led me to reading Davies, serendipity
setting me up for a good degree.
The sward, the
livestock which graze it and the soil that anchors and nourishes it
forms a Trinity (his words). As head of the Grassland Research
Institute, Davies was advocating grassland improvement and ley
farming where appropriate, but believed in herb-rich seed mixtures
with maybe a smidgeon of phosphate fertiliser to encourage the
nitrogen fixing legumes. Perhaps allowing the farmer to add a beast
or two per acre making a better living for the family whose children
went to the local schools, whose MF135 had the wrong side of 4,000
hours on the clock, whose grandchildren would want the land to be in
good heart when they inherited. The other book could see that farmers
were sitting on a goldmine, only the right varieties and vast
quantities of fertiliser stood between them and prosperity. Plough,
fertilise and reseed, if it doesn't work plough deeper and add more
fertiliser. If the soil is so damaged that unless or even if there is
not a 'r' in the month your livestock sink up to their hocks, keep
them inside all year, buy a forage harvester and zero graze. If the
resultant slurry pit leaks into a local stream it is an unforeseeable
act of God. With the right accent from public school your children
will be mining the golden streets of the Square Mile not worrying
about working the farm. Anyway, technology and lobbying for subsidies
will always find solutions as problems arise.
The examiner clearly
wanted praise of efficient modern farming, summarised as 'make the
land work for you' not the dusty old long term approach advocated by
Davies which might be summarised as 'improve -but tread carefully and
do no harm'. I obliged in my answer. After all, dust bowls and
disastrous land degradation (Ethiopian famine was on the horizon)
occurred in far off places where people were foolish or greedy about
their farming, not in Great Britain. Yet walking the land the last
few weeks has given me pause for thought.
Back in 1970 Garrett
Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons (1968) had a certain credence.
The idea that unbridled access to common resources would inevitably
lead to their degradation as each individual free rider acted in
their own interests and not those of the wider society appeared to be
unassailable logic. The Enclosure Acts and our system of private land
ownership seemed so well adapted to long term land husbandry. Since
then I worked for 30 years in rural Africa, study after study has
shown that common access to resources is always accompanied by
regulation mechanisms and social sanctions ensuring management for
the good of all. The exceptions I've seen are where extreme social
division backed by political, financial and finally brute force
allows the few to take everything leaving the rest destitute. Back
home we are suffering the 'tragedy of privately owned resources'.
Land managed solely for making the land owner rich is making us all
poorer.
On today's walk drifts of sand, silt or clay clog the lower ends of fields,
footpaths, streams, roads and rivers. Flood waters extend in murky
amoebae on any flat patch. Higher up the wildlife rich chalk meadows
of soaring larks have become desert-bare expanses of broken chalk and
flints. Does this McFlurry of chalk indicate that we are a
Nation in good heart?
No comments:
Post a Comment